Judicial principle — Kuwait Court of Cassation

Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 1014

State of Kuwait · Administrative Law · Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office

English translation of the principle

The authority of the court of merits to ascertain and understand the facts of the case. Its condition. It must have support in the case documents. Example of an unreasonable inference. - The judgment’s inference, from the letter of the Undersecretary of the Ministry of Higher Education addressed to the Undersecretary of the Ministry of Education, that the Scholarships Committee had terminated the scholarship, although that letter did not constitute sufficient evidence to verify this and its issuance was disputed. Defective reasoning requiring its cassation.
Arabic original
سلطة محكمة الموضوع في تحصيل فهم الواقع في الدعوى. شرطه. أن يكون له سنده في أوراق الدعوى. مثال لاستخلاص غير سائغ. - استخلاص الحكم من كتاب وكيل وزارة التعليم العالي الموجه إلى وكيل وزاره التربية إنهاء البعثة من قبل لجنة البعثات دون أن يعد هذا الكتاب دليلا كافيا للتحقق من ذلك وقيام منازعه في صدوره. فساد في الاستدلال يوجب تمييزه.
Original Arabic judgment citations

(الطعن ١٥٠/١٩٩٢ تجاري جلسة ١٥/٢/١٩٩٣ القسم الثالث المجلد الأول ص٨٨٢)

Source: Court of Cassation legal principles collection — Administrative Law — Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office. Printed page 303. PDF pages: 300.

Ask the assistant about this principle

Guidance based on the principle and its source details, separate from the original collection text.

Related principles

Continue your case in the legal workspace

Open legal workspace