Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 198

The mere fact that the first accused rode with the appellant in the latter's car and waited for him, and that the appellant was seen in a state of unsteadiness, stammering in speech, with reddened eyes, or in an abnormal condition. Does not authorize the officer to arrest him and search his car. The reason therefor. These matters and the condition in which he was seen permit the officer to stop him to ascertain his true situation. Condition: the officer's procedures must not involve physical interference with the person being investigated that infringes his personal liberty. The officer's arrest and search of the appellant. Both are void, and the evidence derived from them is void. The officer's testimony and the 2 forensic evidence reports concerning examination of the seized items and analysis of the appellant's urine sample must be excluded after his denial of what was attributed to him in the investigations. The reason therefor.