Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 1739

The papers containing no evidence of fault by the first respondent that prevented the second appellant’s possession of the chalet. His mere assertion that the assignment contract was invalid for duress and was forged. Does not constitute a breach by him of his contractual obligation to warrant against interference. The existence of this breach. Its condition. That the interfering party acknowledge the validity of the contract and nevertheless claim that he has a right over the thing forming its subject matter.