Judicial principle — Kuwait Court of Cassation

Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 3044

State of Kuwait · Civil Matters — Volume 10 · Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office

English translation of the principle

The rule of unjust enrichment. No scope for its application where a contract exists. The reason therefor. Excepted from this is the case of the contract’s nullity or its being disregarded as a basis for the action. - Extinctive prescription of an unjust enrichment action. Commencement of its running in the event of the contract’s nullity. From the date of the final judgment declaring it. The judgment’s contravention thereof. Vitiates it by an error in the application of the law requiring its cassation. Example.
Arabic original
قاعدة الإثراء بلا سبب. لا محل لتطبيقها عند وجود عقد. علة ذلك. يستثنى من ذلك حالة بطلان العقد أو عدم الاعتداد به كأساس للدعوى. - التقادم المسقط لدعوى الإثراء بلا سبب. بدء سريانه في حالة بطلان العقد. من يوم الحكم النهائي به. مخالفة الحكم ذلك. يعيبه بالخطأ في تطبيق القانون بما يوجب تمييزه. مثال.
Original Arabic judgment citations

(الطعن ١٨١/٩٦ تجاري جلسة ١٢/٥/١٩٩٧ مج القسم الرابع - المجلد الخامس ص ٤٠٢)

Source: Court of Cassation legal principles collection — Civil Matters — Volume 10 — Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office. Printed page 566. PDF pages: 566.

Ask the assistant about this principle

Guidance based on the principle and its source details, separate from the original collection text.

Related principles

Continue your case in the legal workspace

Open legal workspace