Judicial principle — Kuwait Court of Cassation

Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 1511

State of Kuwait · Pleadings — Part One · Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office

English translation of the principle

The judges who participated in deliberating on the judgment. They must attend its reading. Failure to state the names of the judges who heard the oral argument, participated in the judgment, and attended its pronouncement. Its consequence. Nullity of the judgment. An impediment occurring to one of the judges that prevented him from attending the hearing for pronouncement of the judgment. This must be recorded in the judgment. The judgment’s omission of this statement. Its consequence: nullity of the judgment. This nullity relates to public policy. - The expression ‘the judges who issued the judgment.’ Its meaning: the judges who decided the action, not those who attended its reading. The criterion in this respect. The particulars recorded in the judgment and the hearing minutes.
Arabic original
القضاة الذين اشتركوا في المداولة في الحكم. وجوب حضورهم تلاوة الحكم. عدم بيان أسماء القضاة الذين سمعوا المرافعة واشتركوا في الحكم وحضروا النطق به. مؤداه. بطلان الحكم. حدوث مانع لأحد القضاة منعه من حضور جلسة النطق بالحكم. وجوب إثبات ذلك بالحكم. خلو الحكم من هذا البيان. مؤداه: بطلان الحكم. تعلق هذا البطلان بالنظام العام. - عبارة القضاة الذين أصدروا الحكم. المقصود منها: القضاة الذين فصلوا في الدعوى لا الذين حضورا تلاوته. المناط في ذلك. البيانات المثبتة بالحكم ومحضر الجلسة.
Original Arabic judgment citations

(الطعن ٥٣٦/٢٠٠٤ أحوال جلسة ١٩/٢/٢٠٠٦ مجلة القضاء والقانون س ٣٤ ج ١ ص ٣٢٦)

Source: Court of Cassation legal principles collection — Pleadings — Part One — Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office. Printed page 662. PDF pages: 656.

Ask the assistant about this principle

Guidance based on the principle and its source details, separate from the original collection text.

Related principles

Continue your case in the legal workspace

Open legal workspace