Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 4110

A claim or defense presented before the court of merits, on which a determination is unequivocally requested, and which is capable of changing the outcome of the action: the court must answer it. Failure to do so. Its judgment is regarded as devoid of reasons and defective for invalidating insufficiency of reasoning. Example: concerning the court of merits' failure to respond to the acknowledgment by the investigator of the Labor Relations Department of the appellant's entitlement to an end-of-service gratuity. - Submission of a document as an indication of reliance on the correctness of its contents:-