Judicial principle — Kuwait Court of Cassation

Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 3321

State of Kuwait · Pleadings — Part Three · Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office

English translation of the principle

The plaintiff's or appellant's failure to attend the hearing does not prevent determination of either. The condition for this. Example. The Court of Appeal's proceeding to determine the action and not ordering it struck out for the female appellant's absence. - The judgment's omission of a statement that the plaintiff knew of the hearings scheduled for consideration of his action. Does not vitiate it where the papers contain evidence that such knowledge was established. Thirteenth: Intervention by the Public Prosecution at first instance does not dispense with its intervention on appeal
Arabic original
تخلف المدعي أو المستأنف عن الحضور بالجلسة غير مانعٍ من الفصل فيهما. شرط ذلك. مثال. تصدي محكمة الاستئناف للفصل في الدعوى وعدم القضاء بشطبها لغياب المستأنفة. - خلو الحكم من بيان علم المدعي بالجلسات المحددة لنظر دعواه. لا يعيبه متى اشتملت الأوراق على ما يفيد تحققه. ثالث عشر تدخل النيابة العامة أمام أول درجة لا يغني عن تدخلها في الاستئناف
Original Arabic judgment citations

(الطعن ٧/١٩٩٢ أحوال شخصية جلسة ٢٨/١١/١٩٩٢ مج القسم الثالث المجلد الثاني ص٥٣٢)

Source: Court of Cassation legal principles collection — Pleadings — Part Three — Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office. Printed page 564. PDF pages: 561.

Ask the assistant about this principle

Guidance based on the principle and its source details, separate from the original collection text.

Continue your case in the legal workspace

Open legal workspace