Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 829
State of Kuwait · Pleadings — Part Three · Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office
English translation of the principle
Omission to respond to a defence that does not affect the outcome reached by the challenged judgment. Does not constitute inadequate reasoning. The reason for this. An example of what does not constitute inadequate reasoning. - The judgment’s failure to quote the texts of documents whose evidentiary import it rejected, where it merely referred to them and they were set out in the litigants’ memoranda:-
Arabic original
إغفال الرد على دفاع غير مؤثر في النتيجة التي انتهى إليها الحكم المطعون فيه. لا يعد قصوراً. علة ذلك. مثال لما لا يعد قصوراً. - عدم ذكر الحكم نصوص مستندات أطرح دلالتها متى اكتفى بالإشارة إليها وكانت مبينة بمذكرات الخصوم:-Original Arabic judgment citations
(الطعن ٥٦٦/٢٠٠٤ تجاري جلسة ٦/٥/٢٠٠٦ مجلة القضاء والقانون س٣٤ ج٢ ص١١٦)
Source: Court of Cassation legal principles collection — Pleadings — Part Three — Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office. Printed page 138. PDF pages: 135.
Ask the assistant about this principle
Guidance based on the principle and its source details, separate from the original collection text.