Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 50

Summary: - The challenged judgment’s attribution to the appellant of what he admitted in the Public Prosecution investigations. The allegation of erroneous attribution is thereby excluded. Rule: Since examination of the papers shows that the first appellant admitted in the Public Prosecution investigations that he alone was responsible for completing the transactions for crediting sums received from the Ministry of Defence to the enforcement accounts, which is precisely what the challenged judgment attributed to him, it did not thereby attribute to him something he had not said. The allegation of erroneous attribution is thus excluded, and the aforementioned first appellant’s complaint in this regard is incorrect.