Judicial principle — Kuwait Court of Cassation

Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 1068

State of Kuwait · Criminal Procedure · Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office

English translation of the principle

The judgment's recording in its preamble of the names of the panel that issued it after they heard the pleadings and signed its draft, and likewise in the remaining minutes of previous hearings. Their omission from the minutes of the final hearing through the clerk's oversight does not affect its validity. - Proving the contrary of what conflicts with what is recorded in the judgment's preamble may only be done by a challenge alleging forgery. - The original copy of the judgment. Its inclusion of a statement indicating that it was issued in a public hearing. Meaning thereof. The proceedings were conducted correctly in accordance with the law. A challenge asserting otherwise. Its means: a challenge alleging forgery of the judgment. 5- Constitution of the litigation:-
Arabic original
إثبات الحكم بديباجته أسماء الهيئة التي أصدرته بعد سماعهم المرافعة وتوقيعهم على مسودته وكذلك باقي محاضر الجلسات السابقة. لا يغير من صحته خلو محضر الجلسة الختامية من أسمائهم سهواً من أمين السر. - إثبات عكس ما يخالف الثابت بديباجة الحكم لا يكون إلاّ بالطعن بالتزوير. - النسخة الأصلية للحكم. تضمنها ما يفيد أنه صدر في جلسة علنية. مفاد ذلك. أن الإجراءات تمت صحيحة وفق القانون. الطعن بما يخالف ذلك. وسيلته: الطعن بالتزوير في الحكم. ٥- انعقاد الخصومة:-
Original Arabic judgment citations

(الطعن ٧٣٩/٢٠٠٥ جزائي جلسة ١٣/٢/٢٠٠٧ مجلة القضاء والقانون السنة ٣٥ الجزء الأول)

Source: Court of Cassation legal principles collection — Criminal Procedure — Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office. Printed page 348. PDF pages: 341.

Ask the assistant about this principle

Guidance based on the principle and its source details, separate from the original collection text.

Related principles

Continue your case in the legal workspace

Open legal workspace