Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 155

The mere fact that the first accused rode with the appellant in the latter's car and waited for him, and that the appellant was seen unsteady, stammering in speech, with reddened eyes, or in an abnormal state. Does not authorize the officer to arrest him and search his car. Reason therefor. These matters and the condition in which he was seen permit the officer to stop him to investigate his situation. Condition thereof: the officer's procedures must not involve physical interference with the person under inquiry that infringes his personal liberty. The officer's arrest and search of the appellant. Both are invalid, and the evidence derived from them is invalid. The officer's testimony and the two forensic reports examining the seized items and analyzing the appellant's urine sample must be excluded after his denial, during the investigations, of the allegations against him. Reason therefor. - Absence from the papers of evidence capable of being relied upon for conviction. Requires an acquittal. Example.