Judicial principle — Kuwait Court of Cassation

Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 300

State of Kuwait · Criminal Procedure · Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office

English translation of the principle

Determining whether or not any of the seized items have been tampered with. For the trial court. Dispute over that. Factual. - Procedures for recording and sealing the seized items and documenting that in the seizure report. An organizational matter. Their violation does not entail nullity. Challenging the hearing minutes as void for omitting a statement of the seized items. A manifestly invalid defense; the judgment is not faulted if it disregards it.
Arabic original
تقدير ما إذا كانت يد العبث قد امتدت إلى شيء من المضبوطات من عدمه. لمحكمة الموضوع. الجدل في ذلك. موضوعي. - إجراءات رصد المضبوطات وتحريزها واثبات ذلك بمحضر الضبط. مسألة تنظيمية. مخالفتها لا ترتب البطلان. النعي على محضر الجلسة بالبطلان لإغفاله بيان المضبوطات. دفاع ظاهر البطلان لا على الحكم إن التفت عنه.
Original Arabic judgment citations

(الطعن ١٤٠/٢٠٠٠ جزائي جلسة ٥/١٢/٢٠٠٠ القسم الرابع – المجلد السابع ص ١١٥)

Source: Court of Cassation legal principles collection — Criminal Procedure — Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office. Printed page 189. PDF pages: 182.

Ask the assistant about this principle

Guidance based on the principle and its source details, separate from the original collection text.

Related principles

Continue your case in the legal workspace

Open legal workspace