Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 2137

Establishment that the appellant’s request for a judgment erasing and cancelling registration of the contract insofar as it included the sale of his share in the real property is in reality a request that that instrument be ineffective against him insofar as it included the respondent’s acquisition of the appellant’s share, for lack of the majority. The judgment’s characterization of the action as an objection to the majority’s notice of disposal of the real property and its determination thereof on that basis. An error in the application of the law that prevented it from determining the appellant’s requests according to their true nature.