Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 3125

The absence from the papers of evidence of fault by the first respondent that prevented the second appellant's possession of the chalet. His mere assertion of the invalidity of the assignment contract on grounds of duress and its forgery. Does not constitute a breach by him of his contractual obligation to warrant against interference. The existence of this breach. Its condition. The interfering party's acknowledgment of the validity of the contract and his assertion, notwithstanding that acknowledgment, that he has a right over the thing forming the subject matter of the contract.