Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 1896

The complaint against the challenged judgment for relying on the expert's report, which did not specify the third respondent's entitlements held by him, in respect of which it concluded that the first respondent had effected a set-off, and concluded that her indebtedness exceeded those entitlements without explaining how it derived that conclusion. Establishment that the expert concluded from the documents submitted to him that the appellant was not entitled to what it claimed from the first respondent, owing to obligations incumbent on the third respondent exceeding her share of the payments received from the Ministry of Public Works. Its effect. The complaint is incorrect.