Judicial principle — Kuwait Court of Cassation

Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 2259

State of Kuwait · Civil Matters — Volume 11 · Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office

English translation of the principle

The employee's right to claim his prescribed financial entitlements. Its prescription upon the expiry of five years from the date of entitlement or one year from the date he becomes aware of them, whichever period expires sooner. The meaning of the knowledge from which the one-year limitation period begins to run: the employee's actual, not conjectural or presumed, knowledge of his financial right, its extent and its essential elements, enabling him to claim it administratively and judicially. Expiry of the period without claiming the right, in the absence of an impediment, despite his knowledge of it. The provisions of one-year prescription apply. Absence of knowledge of the right. The period for this type of prescription does not begin. The court's ascertainment of the employee's knowledge of his aforementioned right and determination of the event from which - 437 - Obligation prescription begins. Questions of fact. Its assessment is a matter for the court of merits so long as it is reasonable. The challenged judgment's departure from the foregoing view. It renders it defective and requires its cassation.
Arabic original
حق الموظف في المطالبة بالحقوق المالية المقررة له. تقادمه بمضي خمس سنوات من تاريخ الاستحقاق أو سنة من تاريخ علمه بها أي المدتين أقرب. المقصود بالعلم الذي يبدأ منه سريان التقادم الحولي: هو علم الموظف علماً حقيقياً لا ظنياً ولا افتراضياً بحقه المالي ومداه وعناصره الأساسية ليتسنى له المطالبة به إدارياً وقضائياً. انقضاء المدة دون المطالبة بالحق مع عدم وجود المانع رغم علمه به. تسري أحكام التقادم الحولي. عدم توافرالعلم بالحق. لا تبدأ مدة هذا النوع من التقادم. استخلاص المحكمة علم الموظف بحقه سالف البيان وتحصيل الواقعة التي يبدأ منها - ٤٣٧ - التزام التقادم. من المسائل المتعلقة بالواقع. تقديره موضوعي ما دام سائغاً. مخالفة الحكم المطعون فيه النظر المتقدم. يعيبه ويُوجب تمييزه.
Original Arabic judgment citations

(الطعن ٥٠/٢٠٠٦ إداري جلسة ٣/٢/٢٠٠٩ مجلة القضاء والقانون س ٣٧ ج ١ ص ١٤٠)

Source: Court of Cassation legal principles collection — Civil Matters — Volume 11 — Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office. Printed page 437. PDF pages: 437–438.

Ask the assistant about this principle

Guidance based on the principle and its source details, separate from the original collection text.

Related principles

Continue your case in the legal workspace

Open legal workspace