Judicial principle — Kuwait Court of Cassation

Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 329

State of Kuwait · Pleadings — Part One · Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office

English translation of the principle

The judge’s obligation to refer to the legal provision applicable to the facts of the dispute in the action. He must adhere to the wording and limits of the provision. Clarity of its meaning. It is impermissible to adopt anything contrary to it, restrict it, or add to it, as this would create, through interpretation and construction, a new rule different from the legislature’s intent. - It is impermissible to inquire into the rationale and motives of legislation except where the provision is obscure or the meaning of its wording is ambiguous. The reason therefor. Implication carries no weight against an express statement. - Interpretation. Its condition.
Arabic original
التزام القاضي بالرجوع إلى النص القانوني المنطبق على واقعة النزاع في الدعوى. وجوب التزامه عبارة النص وحدوده. وضوح دلالته. عدم جواز الأخذ بما يخالفها أو يقيدها أو يزيد عليها لما في ذلك من استحداث لحكم جديد مغاير لمراد المشرع عن طريق التفسير والتأويل. - عدم جواز البحث في حكمة التشريع ودواعيه إلا عند غموض النص أو وجود لبس في مفهوم عباراته. علة ذلك. لا عبرة بالدلالة مقابل التصريح. - التفسير. شرطه.
Original Arabic judgment citations

(الطعنان ٢٧٢، ٢٨٨/٢٠٠٧ إداري جلسة ١٥/٤/٢٠٠٨ مجلة القضاء والقانون س ٣٦ ج ٢ ص ٨٤)

Source: Court of Cassation legal principles collection — Pleadings — Part One — Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office. Printed page 405. PDF pages: 399.

Ask the assistant about this principle

Guidance based on the principle and its source details, separate from the original collection text.

Related principles

Continue your case in the legal workspace

Open legal workspace