Judicial principle — Kuwait Court of Cassation

Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 1023

State of Kuwait · Pleadings — Part Two · Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office

English translation of the principle

Assessment of a lawyer's fees for non-judicial work where there is no written agreement thereon, or one exists but is void. How it is effected. Bringing an ordinary action in accordance with the rules of the Civil Procedure Law. Its relation to public policy. Contravening that and ruling that the action is inadmissible for not having been brought through the procedure prescribed by law. A deficiency requiring cassation thereof. - A lawyer's pursuit of an ordinary action to claim his fees for judicial work entrusted to him, departing from the procedure prescribed by law therefor, namely submitting an application by petition to the court that heard the action. Its effect. Its inadmissibility.
Arabic original
تقدير أتعاب المحامي عن العمل غير القضائي في حالة عدم وجود اتفاق مكتوب عليها أو وجد وكان باطلاً كيفيته. رفع دعوى عادية وفقاً لقواعد قانون المرافعات. تعلق ذلك بالنظام العام. مخالفة ذلك. والقضاء بعدم قبول الدعوى لعدم رفعها بالطريق الذي رسمه القانون. قصور يوجب تمييزه. - اتباع المحامي طريق الدعوى العادية للمطالبة بأتعابه عن العمل القضائي الموكل فيه متنكباً الطريق الذي رسمه القانون لذلك وهو تقديم طلب على عريضة إلى المحكمة التي نظرت الدعوى. أثره. عدم قبولها.
Original Arabic judgment citations

(الطعن ١٧٩/٢٠٠٠ مدني جلسة ٧/٥/٢٠٠١ مج القسم الرابع المجلد الرابع ص٥٨١)

Source: Court of Cassation legal principles collection — Pleadings — Part Two — Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office. Printed page 195. PDF pages: 192.

Ask the assistant about this principle

Guidance based on the principle and its source details, separate from the original collection text.

Related principles

Continue your case in the legal workspace

Open legal workspace