Judicial principle — Kuwait Court of Cassation

Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 1445

State of Kuwait · Pleadings — Part Two · Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office

English translation of the principle

The judge's ratification of a settlement agreement does not constitute adjudication of a dispute. The judge's function is confined to recording the agreement reached before him. Its effect. A judgment declaring inadmissible the intervention of a person seeking judgment in his own favour on a claim connected with the action. It does not render the applicant for intervention a litigant or party to the action. Rejection of the plea that the action may not be heard because it has already been adjudicated. Correct. - Intervention asserting an independent claim:-
Arabic original
تصديق القاضي على عقد الصُلح لا يعد فصلاً في خصومة. قصر وظيفة القاضي على إثبات ما حصل أمامه من اتفاق. أثره. الحكم بعدم قبول التدخل ممن يطلب الحكم لنفسه بطلب مرتبط بالدعوى. ليس من شأنه اعتبار طالب التدخل خصماً في الدعوى أو طرفاً فيها. رفض الدفع بعدم جواز نظر الدعوى لسابقة الفصل فيها. صحيح. - التدخل الهجومي:-
Original Arabic judgment citations

(الطعنان ٧١٦، ٨١١/٢٠٠٥ تجاري جلسة ٢٦/١١/٢٠٠٦ مج القسم الخامس المجلد السابع ص٢٠٤)

Source: Court of Cassation legal principles collection — Pleadings — Part Two — Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office. Printed page 265. PDF pages: 262.

Ask the assistant about this principle

Guidance based on the principle and its source details, separate from the original collection text.

Continue your case in the legal workspace

Open legal workspace