Judicial principle — Kuwait Court of Cassation

Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 1056

State of Kuwait · Pleadings — Part Three · Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office

English translation of the principle

Evidentiary procedures. The court may depart from them. The condition for that: its judgment must not have included a conclusive ruling on an issue concerning the admissibility or inadmissibility of proof. - The appellant bringing the action relying solely on the decisive oath for his claim. The Court of Cassation’s ruling that proof by this means of evidence is admissible and that the oath satisfies the formal and substantive conditions for its admission. A conclusive ruling. The respondent may not dispute it anew. - 167 - Civil Procedure - Cogent inference:-
Arabic original
إجراءات الإثبات. جواز عدول المحكمة عنها. شرط ذلك: ألا يكون حكمها قد تضمن قضاءً قطعياً في مسألة تتعلق بجواز أو عدم جواز الإثبات. - رفع الطاعن الدعوى إرتكاناً إلى اليمين الحاسمة فقط في إدعائه. قضاء محكمة التمييز بجواز الإثبات بهذا الطريق من طرق الإثبات واستيفاء اليمين شروط قبولها الشكلية والموضوعية. قضاء قطعي. عدم جواز معاودة منازعة المطعون ضده فيه. - ١٦٧ - المرافعات - الاستخلاص السائغ:-
Original Arabic judgment citations

(الطعن ٦٤٥/٢٠٠٨ مدني جلسة ٢/٥/٢٠١١ مجلة القضاء والقانون س٣٩ ج٢ ص٢٧١)

Source: Court of Cassation legal principles collection — Pleadings — Part Three — Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office. Printed page 167. PDF pages: 164.

Ask the assistant about this principle

Guidance based on the principle and its source details, separate from the original collection text.

Related principles

Continue your case in the legal workspace

Open legal workspace