Judicial principle — Kuwait Court of Cassation

Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 4269

State of Kuwait · Pleadings — Part Three · Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office

English translation of the principle

Assessment of a lawyer’s fees for non-judicial work where there is no written agreement concerning them, or one exists but is void. How this is done. Bringing an ordinary action in accordance with the rules of the Code of Civil Procedure. This concerns public policy: contravening this and ruling that the action is inadmissible because it was not brought by the route prescribed by law. A deficiency requiring cassation of the judgment. - A lawyer’s following the route of an ordinary action to claim his fees for the judicial work entrusted to him, departing from the route prescribed by law for this, namely submitting an application by petition to the court that heard the action. Its effect. Its inadmissibility.
Arabic original
تقدير أتعاب المحامي عن العمل غير القضائي في حالة عدم وجود اتفاق مكتوب عليها أو وُجد وكان باطلاً. كيفيته. رفع دعوى عادية وفقاً لقواعد قانون المرافعات. تعلق ذلك بالنظام العام: مخالفة ذلك والقضاء بعدم قبول الدعوى لعدم رفعها بالطريق الذي رسمه القانون. قصور يوجب تمييزه. - اتباع المحامي طريق الدعوى العادية للمطالبة بأتعابه عن العمل القضائي الموكل فيه متنكباً الطريق الذي رسمه القانون لذلك وهو تقديم طلب على عريضة إلى المحكمة التي نظرت الدعوى. أثره. عدم قبولها.
Original Arabic judgment citations

(الطعن ١٧٩/٢٠٠٠ مدني جلسة ٧/٥/٢٠٠١ مج القسم الرابع المجلد الثاني ص٤٨٦)

Source: Court of Cassation legal principles collection — Pleadings — Part Three — Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office. Printed page 752. PDF pages: 749.

Ask the assistant about this principle

Guidance based on the principle and its source details, separate from the original collection text.

Related principles

Continue your case in the legal workspace

Open legal workspace