Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 990

The complaint against the challenged judgment for adopting the expert's report, which did not specify the third respondent's entitlements held by him, in respect of which it concluded that the first respondent had effected a set-off, and concluded that her indebtedness exceeded those entitlements without explaining how it derived this. Establishment that the expert concluded from the documents submitted to him that the appellant was not entitled to what the first respondent was claiming, owing to obligations borne by the third respondent exceeding her share of the payments received from the Ministry of Public Works. Its effect. The complaint is incorrect.