Judicial principle — Kuwait Court of Cassation

Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 279

State of Kuwait · Commercial and Labour — Volume 9 · Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office

English translation of the principle

The appellant's insistence that the two respondents be ordered to return what they received without right because they failed to perform their obligation to sign the sale contract, thereby enriching themselves without lawful cause at his expense. Establishment of the contract's absolute nullity because it included a contract for sale of a business not embodied in an official instrument. The challenged judgment's dismissal of the action on the ground that the rules of enrichment cannot be applied owing to the existence of a contractual relationship. An error in applying the law that prevented it from assigning the action its correct legal characterization. - 56 - Commercial
Arabic original
تمسك الطاعن بالزام المطعون ضدهما برد ما تسلماه بغير حق لعدم تنفيذ التزامهما بالتوقيع على عقد البيع بما يكونا قد أثريا دون سبب مشروع على حسابه. ثبوت بطلان العقد بطلاناً مطلقاً لتضمنه عقد بيع متجر لم يفرغ في ورقة رسمية. قضاء الحكم المطعون فيه برفض الدعوى استناداً إلى عدم جواز إعمال قواعد الإثراء لوجود علاقة تعاقدية. خطأ في تطبيق القانون حجبه عن رد الدعوى إلى تكييفها القانون الصحيح. - ٥٦ - تجاري
Original Arabic judgment citations

(الطعن ٢٤٨/٢٠٠٢ تجاري جلسة ١١/١٠/٢٠٠٣ مج القسم الخامس - المجلد الثالث ص ٣٢)

Source: Court of Cassation legal principles collection — Commercial and Labour — Volume 9 — Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office. Printed page 56. PDF pages: 56.

Ask the assistant about this principle

Guidance based on the principle and its source details, separate from the original collection text.

Related principles

Continue your case in the legal workspace

Open legal workspace