Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 3257

Establishment that the original creditor and the respondent bank mutually rescinded the assignment of the right and notified the appellant thereof. Its implication. The debt forming the subject of the action remains owed by the appellant and has not passed to the State because it was not included in the authenticated declaration. The challenged judgment's conclusion on that basis that the appellant's request to invalidate the notification of cancellation of the assignment on account of discharge from the debt is unfounded. Does not vitiate it.