Judicial principle — Kuwait Court of Cassation

Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 18

State of Kuwait · Administrative Law · Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office

English translation of the principle

Clarity of the wording of the provision. Its effect. It is impermissible to adopt what contradicts it or to restrict it. The reason therefor. Not introducing a rule different from the legislature’s intent. - 11 - Administrative - The three cases in which deduction or attachment of an employee’s salary or any amounts payable to the Government by the employee is permitted. What they are: court-ordered maintenance, payment of what is owed by him to the Government by reason of the performance of his duties, or recovery of what was paid to him without entitlement. The Government has the right of deduction in the first and second cases without an enforceable instrument. - The phrase “recovery of what was paid to him without entitlement” appearing in a general, unrestricted form without qualification. Its effect. It may not be restricted. The consequence thereof: deduction may be made directly from the employee’s salary even if unrelated to his employment. The judgment’s departure therefrom on the ground that the amounts were paid to the employee in his capacity as a student. An error in applying the law requiring its cassation.
Arabic original
وضوح عبارة النص. أثره. عدم جواز الأخذ بما يخالفه أو تقييده. علة ذلك. عدم استحداث حكم مغاير لمراد المشرع. - ١١ - الإداري - الحالات الثلاث التي يجوز فيها الخصم أو توقيع الحجز على مرتب الموظف أو أية مبالغ واجبة الأداء للحكومة من الموظف. ماهيتها: نفقة محكوماً بها أو أداء ما يكون مطلوباً للحكومة منه بسبب أداء وظيفته أو استرداد ما صرف له بغير وجه حق. للحكومة حق الخصم في الحالتين الأولى والثانية دون سند تنفيذي. - ورود عبارة "استرداد ما صرف له بغير وجه حق "في صيغة عامة مطلقة دون تخصيص. أثره. عدم جواز تقييدها. مؤدى ذلك: أنه يجوز الخصم من راتب الموظف مباشرة ولو كانت غير متعلقة بوظيفته. مخالفة الحكم ذلك على سند من أن المبالغ صرفت للموظف بصفته دارساً. خطأ في تطبيق القانون يُوجب تمييزه.
Original Arabic judgment citations

(الطعن ٨٥٥/٢٠٠١ إداري جلسة ٢٥/١١/٢٠٠٢ القسم الخامس المجلد التاسع ص٢٨٤)

Source: Court of Cassation legal principles collection — Administrative Law — Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office. Printed page 11. PDF pages: 8–9.

Ask the assistant about this principle

Guidance based on the principle and its source details, separate from the original collection text.

Related principles

Continue your case in the legal workspace

Open legal workspace