Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 287

Complicity subsequent to the crime, following the Constitutional Court’s ruling that the provisions of clauses First and Second of Article 49 of the Penal Code were unconstitutional insofar as they deemed a person an accomplice in the crime if he performed any of the acts stipulated in those two clauses, and that the provision of the first paragraph of Article Fifty-Five was unconstitutional insofar as it punished anyone who performed any such act. Its establishment. Where the perpetrator knew that the commission of the crime had been completed and unlawfully obtained a benefit for himself or another person from the commission of the crime, with knowledge thereof. - Inferring complicity in the crime after its occurrence. A matter for the trial court. Its inference of its occurrence from the circumstances and attendant circumstances of the case suffices, provided it is sound. An example.