Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 463
State of Kuwait · Penal Law · Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office
English translation of the principle
Correspondence between the witness's statements and the substance of the technical evidence is unnecessary. What suffices for that. - An example of the absence of contradiction between testimonial and technical evidence in an offence of causing infirmity. Fourth: Battery resulting in severe bodily pain or inability to use a limb:-
Arabic original
تطابق أقوال الشاهد ومضمون الدليل الفني غير لازم. ما يكفي لذلك. - مثال لانتفاء التناقض بين الدليلين القولي والفني في جريمة عاهة. رابعاً: ضرب أفضى إلى آلام بدنية شديدة أو العجز عن استعمال عضو:-Original Arabic judgment citations
(الطعن ٦٩٤/٢٠٠٥ جزائي جلسة ١٩/٩/٢٠٠٦ القسم الخامس المجلد الثالث عشر ص٧٥٨)
Source: Court of Cassation legal principles collection — Penal Law — Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office. Printed page 121. PDF pages: 118.
Ask the assistant about this principle
Guidance based on the principle and its source details, separate from the original collection text.