Judicial principle — Kuwait Court of Cassation

Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 4118

State of Kuwait · Civil Matters — Volume 10 · Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office

English translation of the principle

Concurrent liability for payment of a debt because the insurer and the third party responsible for the accident are bound by the same debt, although the source of each one’s obligation differs. This entails their joint responsibility for it. Its effect: the creditor may claim the whole debt from each of them separately or from them together, and the injured person’s receipt from one of them of compensation that does not make good the damage does not prevent renewed recourse against the other for compensation for the remaining damage not made good. This does not constitute combining two compensations. The reason for this. - 760 - Obligation Statutory interest as compensation:
Arabic original
تضامم الذمة في الوفاء بالدين لالتزام المؤمن والغير المسئول عن الحادث بنفس الدين مع اختلاف مصدر التزام كل منهما. يرتب مسئوليتهما سوياً عنه. أثره: استطاعة الدائن مطالبة كل واحد منهما منفرداً أو مجتمعين بكل الدين ولا يمنع تقاضي المضرور من أحدهما تعويضاً غير جابر للضرر من معاودة الرجوع على الآخر بالتعويض عما تبقى من الضرر دون جبره. لا يعد ذلك جميعاً بين تعويضين. علة ذلك. - ٧٦٠ - التزام الفوائد القانونية كتعويض:
Original Arabic judgment citations

(الطعن ١٢٣٦/٢٠١٠ تجاري جلسة ٢٦/١٠/٢٠١١ مجلة القضاء والقانون - س ٣٩ ج ٣ ص ٦٧)

Source: Court of Cassation legal principles collection — Civil Matters — Volume 10 — Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office. Printed page 760. PDF pages: 760.

Ask the assistant about this principle

Guidance based on the principle and its source details, separate from the original collection text.

Related principles

Continue your case in the legal workspace

Open legal workspace