Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 188

Assessing the value of the disputed land at the amount assessed by the expert as compensation for the municipality’s seizure thereof. Its inclusion of the value of the loss sustained by the respondent and the profit he has forgone. Its implication. The challenge to the appealed judgment for failure to specify the elements of damage. Has no basis. - Challenging the appealed judgment for failing to take account of the respondent’s contributory fault in not objecting to the regulatory procedures taken and not taking action to prevent them. A legal defence resting on factual elements. Not previously raised before the trial court. Its effect. Its inadmissibility. Before the Court of Cassation.