Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 4608

Assessment of the value of the disputed land at the amount assessed by the expert as compensation for the municipality’s seizure of it. Its inclusion of the value of the loss sustained by the respondent and the profit he missed. Its implication. The objection that the challenged judgment failed to state the elements of damage. Unfounded. - The objection that the challenged judgment failed to take account of the respondent’s contributory fault in not objecting to the regulatory procedures taken and not taking measures to prevent them. A legal defence based on factual elements. Its not having previously been raised before the trial court. Its effect. Its inadmissibility before the Court of Cassation.