Judicial principle — Kuwait Court of Cassation

Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 1539

State of Kuwait · Pleadings — Part Three · Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office

English translation of the principle

Those rulings of the first-instance judgment not encompassed by an amendment in the appellate judgment. Remain affirmed on their reasons even if the appellate judgment contains no reference to them. An example. - The phrase rejecting all other claims. Its inclusion in the appellate judgment. It is confined to what it rejects of the part covered by the amendment and does not extend to other claims not addressed in its reasons. An example.
Arabic original
ما لم يشمله تعديل بالحكم الاستئنافي من قضاء الحكم الابتدائي. يظل مؤيداً بأسبابه ولو خلا الحكم الاستئنافي من الإحالة إليها. مثال. - عبارة رفض ماعدا ذلك من طلبات. إيراد الحكم الاستئنافي لها. انحصارها فيما يرفضه من الجزء الذي تناوله التعديل ولا ينصرف إلى ما عدا ذلك من طلبات لم يتناولها في أسبابه. مثال.
Original Arabic judgment citations

(الطعن ٧٦/١٩٩٢ تجاري جلسة ٢٠/٢/١٩٩٤ مج القسم الثالث المجلد الثاني ص٦٩٠)

Source: Court of Cassation legal principles collection — Pleadings — Part Three — Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office. Printed page 240. PDF pages: 237.

Ask the assistant about this principle

Guidance based on the principle and its source details, separate from the original collection text.

Related principles

Continue your case in the legal workspace

Open legal workspace