Judicial principle — Kuwait Court of Cassation

Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 2101

State of Kuwait · Pleadings — Part Three · Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office

English translation of the principle

The procedures that the expert must undertake if he wishes to be excused from performing his assignment. - The criterion for challenging the expert's work as void is that his procedures be affected by a substantial defect resulting in harm to the litigant or impairment of his right of defence. An allegation that such work was affected by nullity without any of this occurring. Is unfounded.
Arabic original
الإجراءات التي يجب أن يتخذها الخبير إذا ما أراد إعفاءه من أداء مأموريته. - مناط الطعن ببطلان أعمال الخبير أن يلحق إجراءاته عيب جوهري يترتب عليه ضرر للخصم أو إخلالاً بحقه في الدفاع. النعي بأن بطلاناً لحق تلك الأعمال دون ما تحقق أي من ذلك. يكون على غير أساس.
Original Arabic judgment citations

(الطعن ٢٥/٢٠٠٠ عمالي جلسة ١/١٠/٢٠٠١ مج القسم الرابع المجلد الأول ص٥١٢)

Source: Court of Cassation legal principles collection — Pleadings — Part Three — Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office. Printed page 344. PDF pages: 341.

Ask the assistant about this principle

Guidance based on the principle and its source details, separate from the original collection text.

Related principles

Continue your case in the legal workspace

Open legal workspace