Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 115

Summary: - The appellants’ complaint of inconsistency between judicial judgments without disclosing the nature of the inconsistency and its connection to the judgment under appeal, and stating the complaint in general, unspecified terms. An unspecified complaint. The effect thereof: its inadmissibility. Rule: Since the two appellants did not disclose the nature of the inconsistency between the judicial judgments to which they referred in the grounds of appeal, or its connection to the judgment under appeal, but instead stated it in general, unspecified terms, this ground of appeal is therefore unspecified and unclear and warrants being declared inadmissible.