Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 1454

Proof that the original creditor and the respondent bank mutually rescinded the assignment of rights and that the appellant was notified thereof. Its implication. The debt forming the subject matter of the action remains owed by the appellant and was not transferred to the State because it was not included in the notarized acknowledgment. The challenged judgment’s conclusion on that basis that the appellant’s request to invalidate the notification to him of the cancellation of the assignment, on the ground that he was discharged from the debt, was unfounded. This does not vitiate it.