Judicial principle — Kuwait Court of Cassation

Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 1518

State of Kuwait · Pleadings — Part One · Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office

English translation of the principle

The judges who heard oral argument. Participation by others in rendering the judgment, whether by deliberating on it or signing its draft. Impermissible. An impediment affecting one of the judges who rendered the judgment, preventing him from attending the pronouncement hearing, and another taking his place. This must be stated in the judgment; otherwise it is void. - The expression 'the judges who rendered the judgment.' Its meaning. The judges who decided the action, not the judges who attended its reading. The criterion in this respect. The particulars stated in the judgment, supplemented by what appears in the hearing minutes.
Arabic original
القضاة الذين سمعوا المرافعة. اشتراك غيرهم في إصدار الحكم سواء بالمداولة فيه أو بالتوقيع على مسودته. غير جائز. حصول مانع لأحد القضاة الذين أصدروا الحكم حال بينه وبين حضور جلسة النطق به وحل آخر محله. وجوب بيان ذلك في الحكم وإلا كان باطلاً. - عبارة القضاة الذين أصدروا الحكم. المقصود بها. القضاة الذين فصلوا في الدعوى لا القضاة الذين حضروا تلاوته. المناط في ذلك. البيانات المبينة في الحكم مكملة بما يرد في محضر الجلسة.
Original Arabic judgment citations

(الطعن ٣٧٦/٢٠٠٨ مدني جلسة ١٧/١١/٢٠٠٨ مجلة القضاء والقانون س ٣٦ ج ٣ ص ٣١٩)

Source: Court of Cassation legal principles collection — Pleadings — Part One — Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office. Printed page 663. PDF pages: 657.

Ask the assistant about this principle

Guidance based on the principle and its source details, separate from the original collection text.

Related principles

Continue your case in the legal workspace

Open legal workspace