Judicial principle — Kuwait Court of Cassation

Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 3630

State of Kuwait · Pleadings — Part Two · Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office

English translation of the principle

A party raising a material defense and substantiating it with documents. The court’s failure to scrutinize it in light of its significance. Deficiency in reasoning. - The appellant’s insistence that he had no knowledge of service of the appealed judgment through the police station because he was outside the country, such that the time limit for challenging it did not commence against him, and his substantiation thereof with documents. A material defense. The Court of Appeal’s ruling that the appellant’s right to appeal had lapsed, relying on that service as commencing the appeal period without examining and scrutinizing this defense. A deficiency requiring cassation of the judgment.
Arabic original
إبداء الخصم دفاعاً جوهرياً وتدليله عليه بمستندات. إغفال المحكمة تمحيصه بما له من دلالة. قصور في التسبيب. - تمسك الطاعن بعدم اتصال علمه بإعلان الحكم المستأنف عن طريق مخفر الشرطة لتواجده خارج البلاد بما لا ينفتح في حقه ميعاد الطعن فيه وتدليله على ذلك بالمستندات. دفاع جوهري. قضاء محكمة الاستئناف بسقوط حق الطاعن فيه معتدة بذلك الإعلان في بدء سريان ميعاد الاستئناف دون بحث هذا الدفاع وتمحيصه. قصور يوجب تمييز الحكم.
Original Arabic judgment citations

(الطعن ٦٨/٢٠٠٦ تجاري – هيئة عامة - جلسة ٤/٦/٢٠٠٨ مجلة القضاء والقانون س٣٤ ج١ ص١٧)

Source: Court of Cassation legal principles collection — Pleadings — Part Two — Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office. Printed page 684. PDF pages: 681.

Ask the assistant about this principle

Guidance based on the principle and its source details, separate from the original collection text.

Related principles

Continue your case in the legal workspace

Open legal workspace