Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 4193

Deeming the action as though the other litigant had not been served with notice of its continuation within ninety days of its being struck out. Its purpose. How this time limit is to be observed. Expiry of the time limit without serving the other litigant with notice of the scheduled hearing. Its effect. Deeming the action as never having been brought. The nature of this sanction. It does not relate to public policy. - The court registry’s effecting service of notice of resumption of proceedings in the action after it was struck out. Does not relieve the plaintiff of responsibility for attending to and following it up. The reason for this.