Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 1420

The expert's establishment in his report that the State had constructed an electricity line crossing the property before the respondent purchased it. The appellant's insistence that the line had been discontinued and removed. Its implication. The administration's position had not settled on making - 223 - Civil Procedure the seizure permanent. The judgment's departure from this view means that, in addition to contradicting the facts established in the papers, it erred in applying the law, requiring its cassation.