Judicial principle — Kuwait Court of Cassation

Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 1009

State of Kuwait · Civil Matters — Volume 10 · Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office

English translation of the principle

A sale with a right of redemption is the seller's reservation, upon sale, of the right to recover the property sold in return for repayment of the price and expenses. Its implication. The contract is regarded as a loan secured by a possessory pledge and is subject to all provisions governing possessory pledges, including the nullity of an agreement to acquire ownership of the immovable property sold, for the seller's protection. - The judgment's characterization of the contract as a loan secured by a possessory pledge, based on what it inferred from its clauses and the clauses of the lease drawn up between the same parties concerning the same immovable property that is the subject of the sale contract, and that the female appellant had not repaid the price and expenses within the period specified in the leasing agreement, namely one year. Its making repayment of the price a condition for the nullity of the sale of the immovable property, contrary to the meaning of Article 508 of the Civil Code, which did not impose that condition, the implication being that nullity in this case attaches to the contract from its inception merely upon the seller's reservation of his right to recover the property sold in return for repayment of the price to the purchaser, and that this nullity is neither lifted nor extinguished upon the sale so that it becomes valid pursuant to this provision. Its ruling, on that basis, dismissing the action. A violation of the law and an error in its application requiring its cassation.
Arabic original
بيع الوفاء هو احتفاظ البائع عند البيع بحق استرداد المبيع في مقابل رد الثمن والمصروفا ت. مفاده. اعتبار العقد قرضاً مضموناً برهن حيازي وتسري عليه جميع أحكام الرهن الحيازي بما فيها بطلان الاتفاق على تملك العقار المبيع حماية للبائع. - تكييف الحكم للعقد بأنه قرض مضمون برهن حيازي بما استدل عليه من بنوده وبنود عقد الإيجار المحرر بين ذات الطرفين على ذات العقار محل عقد البيع وأن الطاعنة لم تقم برد الثمن والمصروفات خلال المدة المحددة باتفاقية التأجير وهي سنة. وجعله رد الثمن شرطاً لبطلان بيع العقار خلافاً لمدلول نص المادة ٥٠٨ مدني التي لم تشترط ذلك بما مؤداه أن البطلان في هذه الحالة يلحق العقد منذ نشأته بمجرد احتفاظ البائع بحقه في استرداد المبيع في مقابل رد الثمن إلى المشتري ولا يرتفع هذا البطلان أو يزول عند البيع فينقلب صحيحاً تطبيقاً لهذا النص. قضاؤه بناء على ذلك برفض الدعوى. مخالفة للقانون وخطأ في تطبيقه تُوجب تمييزه.
Original Arabic judgment citations

(الطعن ٤٤٧/٢٠٠٣ تجاري جلسة ١٢/٥/٢٠٠٤ مج القسم الخامس - المجلد السادس ص ١٨٥)

Source: Court of Cassation legal principles collection — Civil Matters — Volume 10 — Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office. Printed page 218. PDF pages: 218.

Kuwait law articles mentioned in this principle

Ask the assistant about this principle

Guidance based on the principle and its source details, separate from the original collection text.

Related principles

Continue your case in the legal workspace

Open legal workspace