Judicial principle — Kuwait Court of Cassation

Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 1533

State of Kuwait · Pleadings — Part One · Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office

English translation of the principle

A judge expressing an opinion on the very dispute before him, or in previous litigation between the same litigants of which the case before him constitutes a continuation and a return to it. Its consequence. His disqualification from hearing the action. The reason for this. - The original copy of the judgment is decisive in identifying the judges who issued it. It must be - 666 - Civil Procedure complete with the elements of its validity. It may not be supplemented from another source not derived from it. Example concerning the nullity of a judgment because the judge was disqualified from hearing the action.
Arabic original
إبداء القاضي رأياً في ذات النزاع المعروض عليه أو في خصومة سابقة ترددت بين ذات الخصوم وتعد القضية المطروحة استمراراً لها وعوداً إليها. أثره. عدم صلاحيته لنظر الدعوى. علة ذلك. - العبرة في بيان القضاة الذين أصدروا الحكم بنسخة الحكم الأصلية. وجوب أن تكون - ٦٦٦ - المرافعات مستكملة لمقومات صحته. عدم جواز تكملتها من مصدر آخر غير مستمد منه. مثال بشأن بطلان الحكم لعدم صلاحية القاضي لنظر الدعوى.
Original Arabic judgment citations

(الطعن ٦٧/٢٠٠٥ أحوال جلسة ١٥/١٢/٢٠٠٨ مجلة القضاء والقانون س ٣٦ ج ٣ ص ٤٦٠)

Source: Court of Cassation legal principles collection — Pleadings — Part One — Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office. Printed page 666. PDF pages: 660–661.

Ask the assistant about this principle

Guidance based on the principle and its source details, separate from the original collection text.

Related principles

Continue your case in the legal workspace

Open legal workspace