Judicial principle — Kuwait Court of Cassation

Kuwait Court of Cassation principle number 939

State of Kuwait · Commercial and Labour — Volume 9 · Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office

English translation of the principle

The insurer's payment to the insured of the damage insurance amount. Its effect. Its statutory subrogation to the insured's rights against the third party responsible for the damage. This subrogation is confined to actions available to the insured against the person responsible for the insured damage. Article 801, Civil Code. Its implication. The insurer's payment of compensation to the injured party and the injured party's assignment of his right to compensation to the insurer. They fall outside this scope. - The person paying a debt may be subrogated to the creditor who has received his entitlement whenever the payer is obligated for the debt with the debtor or obligated to pay it on his behalf under the general rules. Article 394/a, Civil Code. The concurrent obligations of the insurer and the third party responsible for the accident to pay the debt in civil liability arising from motor accidents. Its implication. The insurer's payment of compensation to the injured party simultaneously discharges the debt of the third party responsible for the damage. Its effect. The insurer's statutory subrogation to the injured party's rights against the responsible third party. The reason for this. - The insurer's statutory subrogation to the injured party's rights. Its implication. It may have recourse against the responsible person for the compensation it paid, and the right passes to it with its character, accessories, and securities. Proof that the person responsible for the damage is a relative or relative by marriage of the insured sharing the same household, or a person for whose acts the insurer is responsible. Its effect. Recourse against him is barred because the rationale is the same as that of the prohibition in Article 801 of the Civil Code. This relates to public policy. An example concerning the appellant's plea that the insurance company may not have recourse against him for what it paid to the injured parties because he is the son of the owner of the insured vehicle. - 172 - Commercial
Arabic original
دفع المؤمن للمؤمن له مبلغ التأمين من الضرر. أثره. حلوله محل المؤمن له حلولاً قانونياً قبل الغير المسئول عن الضرر. قصر هذا الحلول على الدعاوى التي للمؤمن له قبل المسئول عن الضرر المؤمن منه. م ٨٠١ مدني. مؤداه. وفاء المؤمن للمضرور بالتعويض وحوالة المضرور لحقه في التعويض للمؤمن. خروجها عن هذا النطاق. - جواز حلول الموفى بالدين محل الدائن الذي استوفى حقه متى كان الموفى ملزماً بالدين مع المدين أو ملزماً بوفائه عنه طبقاً للقواعد العامة. م ٣٩٤/أ مدني. تضامم ذمتي المؤمن والغير المسئول عن الحادث في الوفاء بالدين في المسئولية المدينة الناشئة عن حوادث السيارات. مؤداه. وفاء المؤمن بتعويض المضرور وفاءً في ذات الوقت لدين الغير المسئول عن الضرر. أثره. حلول المؤمن محل المضرور حلولاً قانونياً قبل الغير المسئول. علة ذلك. - حلول المؤمن محل المضرور حلولاً قانونياً. مؤداه. جواز رجوعه على المسئول بما وفاه من تعويض وينتقل إليه الحق بصفته وتوابعه وتأميناته. ثبوت أن المسئول عن الضرر قريباً أو صهراً للمؤمن له ممن يكونون معه في معيشة واحدة أو يشخصاً يكون المؤمن مسئولاً عن أعماله. أثره. امتناع الرجوع عليه لوحدة العلة مع حكم المنع الذي أوردته المادة ٨٠١ مدني. تعلق ذلك بالنظام العام. مثال بشأن دفع الطاعن بعدم جواز رجوع شركة التأمين عليه بما أوفته للمضرورين لكونه ابناً لمالك السيارة المؤمن عليها. - ١٧٢ - تجاري
Original Arabic judgment citations

(الطعن ٥٩٠/٢٠٠٢ تجاري جلسة ١١/١٠/٢٠٠٣ مج القسم الخامس - المجلد الرابع ص ٤٧)

Source: Court of Cassation legal principles collection — Commercial and Labour — Volume 9 — Ministry of Justice — Court of Cassation — Technical Office. Printed page 172. PDF pages: 172.

Kuwait law articles mentioned in this principle

Ask the assistant about this principle

Guidance based on the principle and its source details, separate from the original collection text.

Related principles

Continue your case in the legal workspace

Open legal workspace